{"id":31645,"date":"2026-06-26T04:11:37","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T04:11:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/?p=31645"},"modified":"2026-06-26T04:11:37","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T04:11:37","slug":"azerbaijan-moves-to-ease-website-blocking-amid-self-censorship-fears","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/news-feed\/azerbaijan-moves-to-ease-website-blocking-amid-self-censorship-fears\/","title":{"rendered":"Azerbaijan moves to ease website blocking amid self-censorship fears"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Azerbaijan\u2019s parliament is preparing to vote on amendments that would allow authorities to temporarily block websites without a court order, raising fears of increased self-censorship among independent media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the proposed changes to the country&#8217;s information law, executive bodies will be empowered to restrict access to online platforms if they are deemed to host prohibited material.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The bill was approved during a joint parliamentary committee meeting on 23 June and is scheduled for its final third reading in the Milli Majlis (parliament) on 30 June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Existing legislation already bans content related to illegal drugs, pornography, gambling, and suicide promotion, as well as defamation and &#8220;false information&#8221; deemed a threat to public safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, legal experts warn that the new mechanism bypasses the judiciary and introduces vague definitions that could target legitimate journalistic work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Terms like &#8216;false information&#8217; or &#8216;information that could cause public danger&#8217; allow for broad interpretation,&#8221; Fariz Namazli, a legal expert, told independent outlet Abzas Media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Without concrete criteria, it creates serious questions regarding legal certainty.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mr Namazli said the threat of sudden administrative blocking would likely force journalists to be overly cautious when reporting on sensitive public-interest issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;This could lead to self-censorship, particularly when reporting on corruption allegations, state budget spending, and human rights abuses,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He also noted that the law would affect ordinary social media users, who might hesitate to express critical opinions online for fear of legal repercussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Critics have expressed particular concern over the shift in power from courts to administrative bodies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The initial assessment of whether content is illegal will be made by an administrative body rather than an independent court,&#8221; Mr Namazli said, adding that this undermines the principle of equal representation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He warned that blocking an entire website over a single disputed article would also deprive the public of access to other, unrelated news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Azerbaijan began officially blocking independent news websites in 2017 following previous amendments to its telecommunications laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In May of that year, a Baku court approved the blocking of several major independent media outlets, including the Azerbaijani service of Radio Free Europe\/Radio Liberty (RFE\/RL), Meydan TV, and Azadliq.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despite international criticism and a June 2024 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that the blockages violated freedom of expression, many of these websites remain inaccessible within Azerbaijan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Azerbaijan\u2019s parliament is preparing to vote on amendments that would allow authorities to temporarily block websites without a court order, raising fears of increased self-censorship among independent media. Under the proposed changes to the country&#8217;s information law, executive bodies will be empowered to restrict access to online platforms if they are deemed to host prohibited [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":31647,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[1047],"class_list":["post-31645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-feed","tag-editor"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31645"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31645\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31648,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31645\/revisions\/31648"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.irfs.org\/az\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}