Today, 3 March, in the press centre of the Institute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety (IRFS) “Baki ANM” OSS shareholder Alizade Shahin held a press conference regarding the violation of rights of more than 400 people by “Accord” OSS. We present the press release complied by the organizers to your attention the press-release.
Regarding “Baki ANM” OSS and its privatization:
“Baki ANM“OSS became a shareholder society in 1997, waited for its privatization. The privatization began on 22 April, 2006 and ended on 19 September, 2006. There was 123.63 hectare land field (See: certificate) and 4134.62 square meter building (SEE: technical passport) until construction jobs began in the balance of Shareholder society. Now the society has only 123.63 hectare land because the buildings were pilled down. 81.11% shares of the society belonged to Tagiyev Tahmiraz Tagi oglu and the rest 18.89% belonged to the shareholder till the privatization ended. Tagiyev Tahmiraz Tagi oglu was also the chairman of the shareholder society. For your information, Mr.Tagiyev is also the chairman of New Azerbaijan Party Narimanov district organization.
Regarding the development of the events:
Before the privatization ended Mr.Tagiyev signed changing contract with building-construction cooperative “Monolit-S” by the name of the shareholder society using his authority, presented the land field of shareholder society to the cooperative to conduct construction jobs and in exchange he had to buy 1000 square meter living field from new constructions for “Baki ANM” OSS. The price of 1 square meter living field was 370 USA dollars, the price of 1 hectare land field was 31 000 USA dollars when that contract was signed according to the reference of Property Market Participants Public Union (See: PMP reference). The shareholder society had to get property costing 370 000 dollars despite of 2 542 000 the property costing dollars according to the contract. The shareholder society had to give 4 000 square meter non living field bringing income in its property (boxes and so on) and get 1000 square meter living field in exchange. That contract had to be confirmed in only common meeting of shareholders because it is considered as a special important document according to the article 99.3 of Civil Code, but that contract was confirmed only by the signature of administrative personnel chairman signature. Then “Accord Construction Industry” also became as a side on the contract because “Accord Construction Industry” joint “Monolit-S” MTK to itself and began the construction of “Kosmos” living massive in that area. Now 88.64% shares of the shareholder society belong to the founder of “Accord Construction Industry” OSS, Hajiyev Ilgar Allaz oglu, 11.36% belongs to other more than 450 minoretar shareholders. Regarding current situation:
Order given by Baku City Executive Administration to conduct construction jobs, all technical terms given for construction passport, water, sewer, gas, electric, heat (See: order and terms), as well as the land the construction is conducted belong to “Baki ANM”. The only connection between “Baki ANM’ OSS and “Accord Construction Industry” is the contract dated 11 July, 2005. (See: contract) That is illegal contract violating all current legal and logical norms completely. “Accord Construction Industry” OSS conducts advertisement campaign and sells buildings from “Kosmos” living massive to the citizens, sometimes makes a present. The citizens who bought those flats consider that “Accord Construction Industry” is a complete respectable society; conducts construction either in its own area or any organization’s land it took on the basis of agreement.
On Court:
“Accord Construction Industry” OSS are lost in the hearing held on the lawsuits filed by “Baku ANM” OSS shareholders. They don’t have more time. Agreement which is legal document in the conducting of construction in this field was concluded by notary in contradiction with law and signed by administrative personnel chairman who doesn’t have authority.
Decision should be issued in the meeting of shareholders under article 99.3 of the Civil Code and agreement was concluded for the purpose of damage to society in contradiction with regulation of society.
Documents that confirmed mentioned above were collected in the case materials in court. Although it is clear for talented judge and also little child that contract was an invalid, shareholder lost their hope regarding fair decision to be issued by Narimanov District Court Judge Elshane Valiyeva. They asked court to ban selling of buildings of “Accord Construction Industry” OSS and to freeze funds until end of trial investigation. But Judge did not fulfill this request. Although shareholders have doubts, they are optimist. Because they did not intend to give this case only Judges` hope. If Judges issued unfair decision, shareholders will demand Fikrat Mammadov to give explanation regarding this disgrace. They intend to appeal UNO, Council of Europe and other international organizations.
We request Mass Media to give accurate and objective information to community regarding hearing held in the area of Cosmos massive and land and other documents. Citizens should determine place where they put their fund, ten thousands fund is not less, they should put their fund in the faithful places and then they will not face with shareholder’s curse and court problems.
Appeal to Tax Ministry:
At the same time, shareholders appealed to Tax Ministry, and requested to pay attention tax evasion in the contract concluded between “Baku ANM” OSS and “Accord Construction Industry”. Tax Ministry said that Tamiraz Tagiyev gave an explanation that this society was privatized and there is no shareholder there. They considered that Tagiyev is Chairman of YAP and they did not demand evidence regarding writings in the explanation and summed up to look through application under this explanation.
Shareholders appealed to the Ministry of Tax, to Mr. Fazil Mammadov saying that the words which Tahmiraz Tagiyev said are not corresponding to real facts.
Appeal to Justice Ministry:
Shareholders appealed to Justice Ministry regarding affirmation of bartering contract in notary office and violation of law by notary and they request notary and registration office chief to express his position and to take serious measures regarding notary. Appeal was addressed recently that is why response was not come from Ministry.